Energy 2000 – 16 lat (16 years)

Posted on February 26, 2011 by admin

techno trance
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Introduction to work and energy

This entry was posted in Energy and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

50 Responses to Energy 2000 – 16 lat (16 years)

  1. kamer2222 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    @tove5 ?ehehehe…

  2. Alano651 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    co to za nuta 1:16 ?

  3. Torment1994 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 3:23 pm

    @daveman9191 dzi?kuwa ziom :)

  4. daveman9191 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 4:08 pm

    @Torment1994 Marcel Woods – Advanced < — prosz? Ci? bardzo ;)

  5. adam96island says:
    February 26, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    Zajebista Party:)) <3 Polskie Electro i ogólnie polska muzyka rz?dzi!!

  6. livingONstereo says:
    February 26, 2011 at 4:51 pm

    Krakow POLAND

  7. Torment1994 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 5:45 pm

    5:38 mozna prosi? pe?n? nazwe tej nuty ?

  8. TheRoGaL666 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    Impra Fest!

  9. Skalqel says:
    February 26, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    haha jestem tu ;d super imprezka by??

  10. simona15299 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    culll

  11. Mareczek160 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    Fajne.

  12. adrianwoznica1987 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    every weekend. Where a u from?

  13. Cosmicznybolex says:
    February 26, 2011 at 9:14 pm

    DJ manian -heaven to pierwsza piosenka

  14. Tomixer17 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    Fajnie ;ddd

    ps 70 procent ludzi na haju xdd

  15. xDziadeKx says:
    February 26, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    @tove5
    sure even friday i guess

  16. TheStunters13 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 9:54 pm

    @tove5 Yes

  17. MrRastafarian44 says:
    February 26, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    ja z mazur ale i tak tam zajade:DD

  18. SoranPL says:
    February 26, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    Jad? tam w Pi?tek xD
    B?dzie ostro xD

  19. KamilMisiowski says:
    February 26, 2011 at 11:12 pm

    @tove5 This party is in Przytkowice. Every Friday and Saturday

  20. ufomistrz says:
    February 27, 2011 at 12:07 am

    heaven ..wykonanie orginalne bryam adams.. wpiszesz cascada heaven i powinno byc
    pozdrawiam=)

  21. darekzjaktorowa says:
    February 27, 2011 at 12:32 am

    Energy 2000 Is the best

  22. TheRudi175 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 12:40 am

    dobra ludzie podajcie mi tytu? wej?ciówki bo jest chyba najlepsza bez kitu…..

  23. aras119 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 1:16 am

    Laser na wysoko?ci oczu. Brawo dla “inteligenta”, który toustawia?

  24. DjTapPL says:
    February 27, 2011 at 1:59 am

    zajebiste :D

  25. kocimocz44 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 2:42 am

    pojecha?o by si? kiedy? :)

  26. slowquik says:
    February 27, 2011 at 3:06 am

    you make me hate my physics teacher more.

  27. slowquik says:
    February 27, 2011 at 3:10 am

    you make me hate my physics teacher more.

  28. slowquik says:
    February 27, 2011 at 3:19 am

    you make me hate my physics teacher more.

  29. carlitos3o5 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 3:31 am

    If my physics teacher was as good as you, i wouldn’t have to use youtube to learn!!! You’re awesome and thanks.

  30. MrPMG1994 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 3:51 am

    @ballsoffury4 Yes, I think that if there is no friction or air resistance you don’t need any force to keep something in horizontal motion, you do need a force to accelerate something: F = ma

  31. kzhang1234 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 4:27 am

    @ballsoffury4
    you don’t need a constant force to keep something in motion-i could be wrong

  32. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 4:35 am

    C)No forces are doing work on the object
    D)There are no vertical forces acting on the object.

    Now if it is at a constant? speed the net forces must equal zero and there is no acceleration. First off how does it move if something is pushing and pulling on it with the same force? Second, my book says there is work being done by pushing and going against (friction), how is there work being done if the net force is zero? Thanks and blessings :)

  33. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 4:41 am

    C)No forces are doing work on the object
    D)There are no vertical forces acting on the object.

    Now if it is at a constant? speed the net forces must equal zero and there is no acceleration. First off how does it move if something is pushing and pulling on it with the same force? Second, my book says there is work being done by pushing and going against (friction), how is there work being done if the net force is zero? Thanks and blessings :)

  34. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 4:54 am

    C)No forces are doing work on the object.

    D)There are no vertical forces acting on the object.

    Now if it is at a constant? speed the net forces must equal zero and there is no acceleration. First off how does it move if something is pushing and pulling on it with the same force? Second, my book says there is work being done by pushing and going against (friction), how is there work being done if the net force is zero? Thanks and blessings :) ?

  35. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 5:41 am

    C)No forces are doing work on the object.

    D)There are no vertical forces acting on the object.

    Now if it is at a constant? speed the net forces must equal zero and there is no acceleration. First off how does it move if something is pushing and pulling on it with the same force? Second, my book says there is work being done by pushing and going against (friction), how is there work being done if the net force is zero? Thanks and blessings :) ?

  36. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 6:06 am

    C)No forces are doing work on the object.

    D)There are no vertical forces acting on the object.

    Now if it is at a constant? speed the net forces must equal zero and there is no acceleration. First off how does it move if something is pushing and pulling on it with the same force? Second, my book says there is work being done by pushing and going against (friction), how is there work being done if the net force is zero? Thanks and blessings :) ?

  37. ballsoffury4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 6:50 am

    Hi Khan or anyone who can help I’m very annoyed right now I seemed to understand Physics very well when I took the course? but am having a little trouble as I am studying for the Mcat. Anyways I have this question

    An object with a mass of 50 kg moves across a level surface with a constant speed of 15m/s. Kinetic friction=.7 which of the following is true.

    A)The force exerted on the object by kinetic friction is negligible.

    B) There must be some other horizontal? force acting on the object.

  38. narutosramenbuddy says:
    February 27, 2011 at 7:49 am

    YOU SIR ARE AN ANGEL.

  39. Defqon10 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 7:50 am

    at 4:30, its hard to understand your ambiguous problem, doesn’t really give me a good feel for how its quantified because then you bring out other kinematic equations which really confuse things.

  40. canucksrule1000 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 8:03 am

    MayahiiEDU is copying a lot of your videos

  41. Anthonyss4 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 8:26 am

    Thank you soooo soooo much. Seriously man thank you!

  42. thelastbattle19 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 8:33 am

    :D

  43. garzafernandez says:
    February 27, 2011 at 8:55 am

    Find a playful chick make it tonight benaughtyman.info

  44. Joniel120 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 9:12 am

    @Joniel120 MR. SEGUIDO SUCKS!!!!!!!!

  45. Joniel120 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 10:02 am

    Oh yeah, Are you a Physics teacher???
    Because our Physics teacher was SO ANNOYING!!!!

  46. deeeoss21 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 10:56 am

    this guys the man. makes it so much easier

  47. peterleeyu says:
    February 27, 2011 at 11:39 am

    DUDE WIKI LIES

  48. 1mj2288 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    @maybeok1 And so am I! Ready to ace the exams. :D

  49. RAPADURA9 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    This is amazing. COMPLETELY made it clear in 9 minutes compared to 3 days of class totally clueless. THANKS!!!

  50. MaNeSh15 says:
    February 27, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    @SmokerTJ how so?